Articles
|
August 21, 2008
|
APaTS: Advanced Patent Trial Strategies
In Proveris Scientific Corporation v. InnovaSystems, Inc., the defendant sought to invoke the so called "Safe Harbor" provisions in order to avoid liability for patent infringement.
|
|
August 2008
|
The Brief - ABA Magazine
At 5:12 a.m. on April 18, 1906, dust and a deafening rumble filled the air of Northern California. Buildings swayed, walls fell, and the world changed in an instant.
|
|
August 8, 2008
|
APaTS: Advanced Patent Trial Strategies
The patent holder in Muniauction, Inc. v. Thomson Corp. had its verdict for willful patent infringement overturned and its $77 million damage award eliminated.
|
|
July 22, 2008
|
APaTS: Advanced Patent Trial Strategies
The Federal Circuit reviewed whether the changes the Supreme Court decision in MedImmune v. Genentech made to the first prong of the test for declaratory judgment jurisdiction in actions brought by potential infringers impacted the second prong of the same jurisdictional test.
|
|
June 13, 2008
|
The FDA has found an association between a conaminant in the blood-thinning drug heparin and servere adverse reactions which are being reported.
|
|
September 2008
|
Pratt's Journal of Bankruptcy Law
|
|
May 29, 2008
|
APaTS: Advanced Patent Trial Strategies
In Acumed LLC v. Stryker Corp, the Federal Circuit dishes up a tasty decision on claim preclusion that certainly shouldn't ruin a patent holder's appetite for further litigation.
|
|
May 21, 2008
|
On April 25, 2008 Actavis Totowa LLC (formerly known as Amide Pharmaceutical, Inc.) announced the Class I nationwide recall of all strengths of oral Digitek tablets, which is a brand name for digoxin tablets, USP 0.125 mg and 0.25 mg.
|
|
May 19, 2008
|
In a classic subcontractor claim for money, the enforceability of the claim against a contractor and its surety ultimately turned on the lack of the subcontractor’s license at the commencement of performance.
|
|
April 25, 2008
|
Los Angeles Daily Journal
Employment discrimination lawsuits are tales about the human experience. Couched in terms of “retaliation” and “harassment,” these cases require that lawyers explain the complex phenomena of human motivation.
|