Attorneys

Contact Us Contact Us

1.800.553.9910

Carrie M. Lambert


Practice Groups

Selected Results*

Trial counsel in St. Clair Intellectual Property Consultants, Inc. v. Canon, Inc. et al., No. 03-241 (D. Del., filed February 28, 2003) a case in which a federal jury in Wilmington, Delaware awarded Ms. Lambert's client, St. Clair, $34.7 million after a finding that Canon infringed four patents relating to digital camera technology. The verdict was announced on October 8, 2004.

Trial counsel in St. Clair Intellectual Property Consultants, Inc. v. Fuji, Ltd. et al., No. 03-241 (D. Del., filed February 28, 2003) a case in which a federal jury in Wilmington, Delaware awarded Ms. Lambert's client, St. Clair, $3 million after a finding that Fuji infringed four patents relating to digital camera technology. The verdict was announced on October 25, 2004.

Member of trial team in St. Clair Intellectual Property Consultants, Inc. v. Sony Corp. et al., No. 01-557 (D. Del., filed Aug. 14, 2001), a case in which a federal jury in Wilmington, Delaware awarded Ms. Lambert's client, St. Clair, $25 million after a finding that Sony infringed four patents relating to digital camera technology.  The verdict was announced on February 25, 2003.  The parties entered into a license agreement two days later, the terms of which are confidential.

Memberships

  • Federal Bar Association
  • American Intellectual Property Law Association
  • American Bar Association
  • Minnesota State Bar Association
  • Minnesota Intellectual Property Law Association

Civic Associations

  • Children's Law Center

Bar Admissions

  • Minnesota
  • U.S. District Court, Minnesota

Education

  • University of Minnesota Law School, J.D., cum laude (2001), Director (2000-2001) and team member (1999-2000) of the National Moot Court Competition Team
  • University of Michigan - Ann Arbor, B.A., Political Science and Communications, cum laude (1997)

* Past results are reported to provide the reader with an indication of the type of litigation in which we practice and do not and should not be construed to create an expectation of result in any other case as all cases are dependent upon their own unique fact situation and applicable law.

My Pages

Sign up for email updates and track your favorite web pages