Skip to content
  • Home
  • RSS
  • Contact
  • Client Extranet
  • 800.553.9910

Robins, Kaplan, Miller, & Ciresi, L.L.P.

  • Firm
    • Who We Are
    • Why Us?
    • Legal Project Management
    • Offices
    • Selected Matters
    • Diversity
    • Community
    • Rankings & Recognition
    • Trial Practice Center
    • Seminars & Events
    • Press Room
    • 75th Anniversary
  • Lawyers
  • Services
    • Business Litigation

      • Antitrust and Trade Regulation
      • Class Action Litigation
      • Construction
      • Creditor Representation - Insolvency
      • Employment
      • Entertainment and Media Litigation
      • Government and Internal Investigations
      • Estate Trust and Succession Planning and Administration and Related Litigation
      • Franchise and Dealership
      • Health Care Litigation
      • Insurance and Catastrophic Loss
      • Real Estate Litigation
      • Securities and Financial Litigation

      Intellectual Property Litigation

      • Clean Technology
      • International Trade Commission
      • Life Sciences and Hatch-Waxman Intellectual Property Litigation
      • Patent Office Trials
      • Trademark Infringement Litigation

      Personal Litigation

      • Mass Tort Attorneys
      • Medical Malpractice Attorneys
      • Personal Injury Attorneys

      Concentrations

      • Electronic Discovery
      • International Arbitration

      Business Transactions

      • Commercial/Project Finance and Real Estate
      • Corporate Finance and Securities
      • Corporate Governance and Special Situations
      • Estate Trust and Succession Planning and Administration and Related Litigation
      • Franchise and Dealership
      • Mergers and Acquisitions
      • Strategic IP Monetization
  • Publications
    • Articles
    • Legal Updates & Newsletters
    • IP Trend
    • News
  • Locations
    • Atlanta
    • Boston
    • Los Angeles
    • Minneapolis
    • Naples
    • New York
  • Careers
    • Associates
    • Summer Associates
    • Staff Attorneys
    • Project Review Attorneys
    • Staff
  1. Lawyers
  2. Anne Lockner
Anne Lockner
Print

Anne M. Lockner

Partner;
Chair of Firm's Pro Bono Committee
amlockner@rkmc.com 612.349.8470 vCard Address
    • Minneapolis
    • 800 LaSalle Avenue
    • 2800 LaSalle Plaza
    • Minneapolis, MN 55402-2015

Practice Areas

  • Antitrust and Trade Regulation
  • Business Litigation
  • Class Action Litigation
  • Government and Internal Investigations
  • Education
    • Georgetown University Law Center, J.D., cum laude (1999)
    • University of Minnesota, B.A., Political Science, summa cum laude (1996)
  • Professional Associations
    • Federal Bar Association
    • American Bar Association
    • Minnesota State Bar Association
    • Hennepin County Bar Association  
    • Minnesota Women Lawyers
  • Bar Admissions
    • Minnesota
    • U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit
    • U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
    • U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
    • U.S. District Court, Colorado
    • U.S. District Court, Minnesota
    • U.S. District Court, Northern District of Indiana
    • U.S. Supreme Court
  • Experience

    Legal Experience—Solving Complex Business Problems

    Ms. Lockner is a partner in the firm's business litigation department, and acts as lead counsel on numerous complex-litigation cases with multi-million dollars—as well as the clients' reputations—on the line.  She considers it imperative to understand her client's business before developing a strategy for a case, understanding that business objectives and risk tolerance will determine what constitutes a successful outcome. As part of her routine practice, she and the attorneys on her teams meet with the firm's Financial and Economic Consultants to review her clients' 10-K reports or other relevant business information to further that goal. The common thread of Ms. Lockner’s cases is their complexity, even if the legal theory may change.  For instance, she has handled cases involving complex financial, technology, accounting, securities, bankruptcy, corporate structure, tax, and logistics issues to name a few.

    Trial Experience

    Ms. Lockner has extensive experience in first and second chairing trials in both state and federal courts. Most recently, she successfully first chaired a jury trial in defense of a Fortune 50 publicly-traded company in a-breach-of-contract case relating to registered securities where trial counsel on the other side was named one of the "100 Most Influential Lawyers in the History of the State" by Minnesota Law & Politics.  The jury found in favor of Ms. Lockner's client. Two months earlier, she second-chaired a two-week federal criminal conspiracy and tax-fraud case in the Federal District of Minnesota on behalf of a prominent, local businessperson, cross examining the special agent, the revenue agent, and the alleged victim, among others.  The jury acquitted the client on 5 of  9 counts, including those with the most alleged financial losses.

    Early Resolutions

    While she loves trying cases, Ms. Lockner has also had great success in obtaining early resolutions where it serves her clients' best interests. Recently, she successfully obtained summary judgment in a putative nationwide federal class action on behalf of a Fortune 50 company, won a motion to dismiss a complaint alleging various state law fraud claims, and defeated class certification in two federal class actions. For instance, she negotiated an early nationwide class-action settlement before any discovery or advanced motion practice had occurred. The settlement ended up being 60 percent less than what other defendants in similar cases brought by the same plaintiff's counsel settled for after much more extensive discovery and motion practice, providing finality with minimal exposure to the client. She also recently resolved a class action case where no money was paid to the class and the fee award was less than half of plaintiff’s counsel’s lodestar.

    Government and Internal Investigations

    Ms. Lockner also has extensive experience handling governmental investigations and has litigated against and negotiated with numerous Attorneys General throughout the country. She successfully obtained an outright voluntary dismissal of a case that the Ohio Attorney General brought after she obtained sanctions against the State for discovery abuses. In addition, Ms. Lockner has handled and participated in several internal and grand jury investigations and recognizes that there are not only legal, but also public relations and employee-morale ramifications that must be mitigated in these instances.

    Business Counseling

    In-house attorneys, both in and outside the litigation department, have looked to her for guidance with a wide variety of areas of concern. For nearly four years, on a quarterly basis, she and a highly-valued member of the firm's E-Discovery practice have met with a client's in-house commercial litigation team to explore ways in which to increase efficiencies in preserving, collecting, and producing e-discovery materials, resulting in hundreds of thousands of dollars in savings to the client. In another instance, Ms. Lockner was brought in to lead a cross-functional team in implementing a complex, high-profile project relating to the company's massive IT infrastructure in a manner that took into account how those changes could impact pending and future litigation.

    Pro Bono and Community Service—Serving Those In Need

    In addition to her per diem practice, Ms. Lockner heads the firm's nationally-recognized Pro Bono Program. Since Ms. Lockner was named to that position in 2009, the firm has been ranked in the top 10 of Am Law firms two years in a row and was featured as one of five firms nationally whose ranks had increased the most over the previous five years. In 2011, the "Vault" survey named the firm as No. 1 in the nation for its pro bono program. She has been fortunate to represent numerous inspiring clients who have faced debilitating challenges and have thrived despite them, including asylum seekers, foster children, battered women, and veterans. In one case, she began representing an Ethiopian woman seeking asylum two weeks after Ms. Lockner was sworn into the bar. After three trials, two trips to the Board of Immigration Appeals, and finally a trip to the Eighth Circuit where Ms. Lockner argued to overturn the immigration judge's decision, her client was finally awarded asylum status nearly nine years later.

    Ms. Lockner also serves on the board of several organizations including The Advocates for Human Rights, the Legal Aid Society, and the Basilica Landmark. She also serves as one of two trustees to the Basilica of St. Mary where she also sits on the parish counsel and the finance committee. She also is involved with Cristo Rey Jesuit High School in Minneapolis.

    Litigation Philosophy and Objective

    Ms. Lockner's litigation philosophy is to pick her battles well, guided primarily by her clients' needs and objectives. She has been described as having "a velvet glove in one hand and brass knuckles in the other," and she knows when one should be used rather than the other. She also took pride in the business client who told her: "I don't like needing you, but I sure do have fun working with you." In sum, Ms. Lockner's most basic objective is to make her client's life easier—whether it be the in-house legal counsel who has to meet a budget and apprise her board of litigation risks, a business client who wants to capitalize on an opportunity, or the pro bono client who needs our justice system to protect him.

  • Recognition*

    Show All
    • Featured in “11th Annual Women Worth Watching,” Profiles in Diversity Journal (2013)
    • Named a "Litigation Star," Benchmark Litigation (2013 edition)
    • Listed in The Best Lawyers in America (2013 edition)
    • Named a "Future Star," Benchmark Litigation (2011 and 2012 editions)
    • Awarded "2009 Volunteer Award," by The Advocates for Human Rights
    • Named a "Minnesota Rising Star," Super Lawyers (2004-2009, 2011-2012)
    • Named an "Up and Coming Attorney," by Minnesota Lawyer (2004)

     
    *Being named to the list or receiving the award is not intended and should not be viewed as comparative to other lawyers or to create an expectation about results that might be achieved in a future matter.

  • Selected Case Results**

    Show All

    Successful Dismissals By Motion

    Obtained dismissal of a RICO case against a Fortune 50 company. In addition, obtained a sanctions award against the plaintiff’s counsel, a national law firm, for various discovery abuses and misrepresentations.

    Successfully argued a motion to dismiss in Minnesota state court regarding claims of breach of contract and fraud claims.  The Minnesota Court of Appeals affirmed.

    Obtained dismissal on the pleadings of nationwide class action alleging breach of contract, violations of the Ohio & Kentucky Deceptive Business Trade Practices Act, and violations of the Ohio & Kentucky Consumer Protection Act.  Successfully argued before the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals which later affirmed.

    Represented national retailer in nationwide consumer class action alleging breach of contract and unlawful merchandising practices.  Defeated class certification, was granted summary judgment, and subsequently obtained affirmance from the Missouri Court of Appeals.

    Obtained dismissal on the pleadings of a nationwide class action alleging claims of fraud, rescission, and restitution in the District of Colorado.

    Defeating Class Certification

    Defeated class certification in the Northern District of Illinois where plaintiff alleged claims under the Illinois Consumer Fraud and Deceptive Business Practices Act, for breach of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing, common law false advertising, unjust enrichment, and declaratory and injunctive relief. As a result, the plaintiff voluntarily dismissed the case.

    Defeated class certification in the Central District of California where plaintiffs alleged claims under the California Consumers Legal Remedies Act (CLRA), Cal. Civ. Code § 1750; the Unfair Competition Law (UCL), Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code § 17200; the False Advertising Law (FAL), Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code § 17500; breach of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing; for common law advertising; for unjust enrichment; and declaratory and injunctive relief.

    Defeated class certification in a nationwide consumer class action in the Southern District of New York on behalf of a large national corporation.  Plaintiff voluntarily dismissed and declined to appeal.

    Defeated class certification in consumer class action brought in the Southern District of Florida alleging claims under the Florida Deceptive Uniform Trade Practices Act.  Plaintiff voluntarily dismissed case with prejudice.

    Represented national retailer in nationwide consumer class action alleging breach of contract and unlawful merchandising practices.  Defeated class certification and subsequently obtained affirmance from the Missouri Court of Appeals.

    Obtained class decertification from the Texas Supreme Court on behalf of large corporation in a statewide consumer class action alleging breach of contract and unjust enrichment.

    Voluntary Dismissals, Settlements, and Appeals (other than those mentioned above)

    Creatively obtained a temporary restraining order on behalf of an individual that enjoined her former employer from enforcing a non-compete provision. In its notice of appeal hoping to vacate the injunction, the defendants noted that they had "been unable to find a single appellate court decision in Minnesota in which an employee has sought, much less been granted, a TRO based on his or her declaratory judgment action." The parties settled on a confidential basis.

    Obtained voluntary dismissal from the State of Ohio after obtaining sanctions against the State for discovery abuses.

    Obtained voluntary dismissal from the State of Wisconsin against a large, nationwide corporation.

    Obtained reversal from the Eighth Circuit of the lower courts' denials of asylum in a pro bono appeal entitled Hailemichael v. Gonzales, 454 F.3d 878 (8th Cir. 2006).

    Member of post-remand trial team of Eolas Technologies, Inc. and The Regents of the University of California v. Microsoft Corporation.  This case settled on confidential terms on the eve of trial.

    **Past results are reported to provide the reader with an indication of the type of litigation in which we practice and does not and should not be construed to create an expectation of result in any other case as all cases are dependent upon their own unique fact situation and applicable law.

  • Community Service

    Show All
    • Legal Aid Society of Minneapolis, Board of Directors 
    • The Advocates for Human Rights, Board of Directors
    • The Basilica Landmark, Board of Directors
  • Publications and Speeches

    Show All

    Publications

    • How To Avoid Litigation Before It Begins
      InsideCounsel.com (April 5, 2013)
    • What Business People Need to Know About Litigation
      InsideCounsel (February 22, 2013)
    • What Every Business Person Needs to Know About Being Deposed
      InsideCounsel (January 28, 2013)
    • Ten Tips for a Successful Pro Bono Program: Building a Program that Benefits Your Community, Your Attorneys, and Your Organizations
      Bloomberg Law (February 9, 2012)
    • The Fifth Amendment, Vicarious Liability, and the Attorney Client Privilege; How Cooperation and Waiver Can Leave Your Corporation Exposed
      Emergency Envelopes, Volume 1, Issue 1 (November 2005)

    Speeches

    • Effective and Efficient Litigation Case Management
      Minnesota CLE, Webcast (August 17, 2011)
    • E-Discovery and Experts
      2005 E-Discovery Best Practices for Litigation & Document Management
      Mendota Heights, Minnesota, (April 12, 2005)
  • In the News

    Show All

    • Women Worth Watching - Anne M. Lockner, Profiles in Diversity Journal 2013
    • Attorneys Selected as 2013 Best Lawyers in America
    • Attorneys Named as "Minnesota Super Lawyers and Rising Stars 2012"
    • Ten Tips for a Successful Pro Bono Program
    • Robins, Kaplan, Miller & Ciresi L.L.P. Named 2011 NLADA Beacon of Justice Award Winner for Pro Bono Work
    • Robins, Kaplan, Miller & Ciresi L.L.P. Ranks Prominently in Annual Benchmark Litigation Survey
    • Vault Survey Ranks Robins, Kaplan, Miller & Ciresi L.L.P. #1 for Pro Bono
    • Attorneys Named as "Minnesota Super Lawyers and Rising Stars 2011"
    • Firm Receives National Law Journal's 2011 Pro Bono Award
    • The American Lawyer: Pro Bono Success Stories
    • Robins, Kaplan, Miller & Ciresi L.L.P. Ranked 6th in the Nation for Pro Bono
    • Anne Lockner to Receive 2009 Volunteer Award
    • Attorneys Named as "Minnesota Rising Stars 2009"
  • Client Extranet
  • Alumni
  • Site Map
  • Legal Notice
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • 800.553.9910
    • linkedin
    • rss

Firm

  • Offices
  • Selected Matters
  • Rankings & Recognition
  • Trial Practice Center

Lawyers

Services

    • Antitrust and Trade Regulation
    • Business Litigation
    • Class Action Litigation
    • Clean Technology
    • Client Technology Services
    • Commercial/Project Finance and Real Estate
    • Construction
    • Corporate Finance and Securities
    • Corporate Governance and Special Situations
    • Creditor Representation - Insolvency
    • Electronic Discovery
    • Employment
    • Entertainment and Media Litigation
    • Estate Trust and Succession Planning and Administration and Related Litigation
    • Financial and Economic Consultants
    • Franchise and Dealership
    • Government and Internal Investigations
    • Health Care Litigation
    • Insurance and Catastrophic Loss
    • Intellectual Property Litigation
    • International Arbitration
    • International Trade Commission
    • Investigative Services
    • Legal Nurse Consultants
    • Life Sciences and Hatch-Waxman Intellectual Property Litigation
    • Mass Tort Attorneys
    • Medical Malpractice Attorneys
    • Mergers and Acquisitions
    • Paralegals
    • Patent Office Trials
    • Personal Injury Attorneys
    • Real Estate Litigation
    • Science Advisors
    • Securities and Financial Litigation
    • Strategic IP Monetization
    • Trademark Infringement Litigation
    • Trial Support
  • Diversity
  • Careers
  • Publications
  • Offices
  • Contact

© Copyright 2013 Robins, Kaplan, Miller & Ciresi L.L.P. All Rights Reserved. Attorney Advertising. Prior Results Do Not Guarantee A Similar Outcome.